EMBARGOED: CQC demands rapid and widespread improvement in maternity at two Nottingham hospitals

Embargoed until 00.01 hours on Friday 27 May

Please note: an embargoed copy of the inspection reports can be found at the very end of this press release

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has told Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust that it must make significant and immediate improvements to its maternity services.

CQC carried out an unannounced inspection of the trust’s maternity services during March at two of the trust’s hospitals; Nottingham City Hospital and Queen’s Medical Centre (QMC).

The inspection was carried out in response to concerns received about the safety and quality of the services. It was also to check if improvements had been made since conditions were placed on the trust’s registration around staffing, following an inspection in October 2020, and to check on the progress of improvements the trust were told to make following an inspection in April 2021.

Following the latest inspection, the overall rating for both Nottingham City Hospital and Queen’s Medical Centre remains rated requires improvement.

Maternity services at both sites remain rated inadequate overall, as well as for being safe and well-led. Being effective has gone up from inadequate to requires improvement, being responsive has gone down from good to requires improvement and caring remains rated as good. CQC has also issued the trust with a warning notice in relation to safe care and treatment around how they are managing observations, and with regards to the care women are receiving within triage services.

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust remains rated as requires improvement overall and is in segment 4 of NHS England and NHS Improvement’s System Oversight Framework, meaning it receives intensive support through their recovery support programme for NHS trusts facing the toughest challenges.

Fiona Allinson, CQC’s director of operations, Midlands network said:

“We saw staff in the maternity departments at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust working hard to provide care to patients in very challenging circumstances and this is reflected in the good caring rating we gave.

“Although we found some improvements, they are not widespread or rapid enough to address the areas of concern we identified during previous inspections. It’s disappointing that despite several inspections where CQC has told the trust areas they must improve to keep mums and babies safe, serious problems remain.

“One of our biggest concerns was that staff weren’t always carrying out observations on women to check that their condition hadn’t deteriorated. Midwives weren’t always clear who could perform observations, some staff didn’t carry them out as they said it wasn’t their role, and overdue observations went unrecognised. This gave us serious concerns about their ability to recognise and respond to women who were deteriorating, so we have taken enforcement action against the trust to focus them on rapid improvement in this area.

“Despite placing conditions on the trust’s registration in October 2020 due to staffing concerns, we found there were still not enough staff with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe. Although there was good planning work being done to try and manage these shortages, we found services operating with staffing levels that didn’t match planned numbers.

“It was however positive to see improved morale as a result of improvements to reduce the bullying culture we found at our last inspection.  

“Following the inspection, the trust has developed a detailed improvement plan and have been receiving intensive support from NHS England and NHS Improvement since October 2020. A new chief executive has also been appointed who is expected to start in the autumn. These changes now need to deliver the improvements necessary to ensure that all women and babies get good, safe care from both hospitals - and we will be monitoring the trust closely to ensure that progress is being made.”

Throughout both maternity departments, inspectors found the following: 

• There were concerns around women’s access to services and the assessment of risk once they were seen. Women were often waiting to be triaged longer than the trust’s target of 15 minutes and risk assessments weren’t consistently being completed on arrival or admission. Records showed there was also a declining performance trend in the 15 minute target. Home births were being cancelled and women’s planned care and treatment was delayed due to staffing issues.
• The service did not have enough staff to care for women and keep them safe.
• Not all staff had training in key skills. Staff did not always assess all risks to women, and inspectors were not assured staff acted upon concerns in a timely way.
• Staff did not always keep good care records.
• Medicines weren’t always being well managed. Some drugs that should be kept cold were found outside of refrigerators (which the trust did address on inspection) and some with a short expiry date when opened had not been dated. Also, women’s weight was not always being recorded to ensure correct dosage.
• Whilst there were pockets of good incident reporting, learning and some improvements, this wasn’t consistent. Staff told us they didn’t always have time to complete forms, and they didn’t always receive feedback after they had reported incidents or receive information about learning being shared more widely.
• Not all staff received training specific for their role on how to recognise and report abuse. Due to the challenges COVID-19, compliance rates with this training was low.
• Not all staff were aware of the baby abduction policy and hadn’t completed any baby abduction drills.

However, inspectors also found:

• The director of midwifery had identified there was a staffing gap of 35 whole time equivalents (WTE). However, to ensure the service has adequate cover for any staffing absences and training, a paper was due to be presented to the board requesting this be increased 60-65 WTE.
• Staff generally felt confident to make complaints or raise concerns if they witnessed cultural concerns, and new processes to address these formally had been well received by managers and staff. Some staff were still worried these wouldn’t be taken seriously but leaders were working to address this and promote a blame free approach to incident management.
• The service had introduced morning multidisciplinary meetings to review the staffing and pressure of maternity. When pressures were identified, this enabled actions to be taken to support staff.
• Staff understood how to protect women from abuse and controlled infection risk well.
• Overall, staff treated women with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to women, families and carers.
• The service promoted equality and diversity in daily work.
• The trust has introduced a 24/7 maternity advice line to support women throughout their pregnancy.

The reports will be published on the website on 27 May.

Contact  

For media enquiries: 

• Angela Clark, regional communications and engagement manager – 07821 682 509 or angela.clark@cqc.org.uk
• Helen Gildersleeve, regional communications and engagement officer – 07825 939 328 or helen.gildersleeve@cqc.org.uk
• Alternatively, you can email regional.comms@cqc.org.uk

Journalists wishing to speak to the press office outside of office hours can find out how to contact the team on the website.